Jump to content

Talk:Tungsten diselenide

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Transition metal dichalcogenides that practical applications such as solar cells?

[edit]

Re the comment "Transition metal dichalcogenides are semiconductors that have practical applications such as solar cells." It would be reassuring to see some support for such claims. I am a big fan of this class of compounds but I dont think that the diselenides are used for anything of practical interest. If they are, we should develop this aspect.--Smokefoot (talk) 13:26, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The statement appears to have a cite. Is that invalid? Lfstevens (talk) 19:49, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Checking .... But for sure, a journal article saying that something is useful is not a very good source. Researchers say all kinds of stuff about materials that they have affection for.--Smokefoot (talk) 12:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Over 1000 references - lets focus on secondary sources?

[edit]

Recent expansion of article to include newer work, good idea but how does one choose among the 300+ articles that have appeared in the past few years? --Smokefoot (talk) 12:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, with the caveats noted above. There's no perfect rule here, but fundamentally the decision to include a fact in a piece involves editorial judgment. The fact that someone thinks something is notable is the first test. If someone else disagrees, they can discuss it and seek consensus with a larger group. If a fact arrives by way of a news article rather than directly from a journal article, that's a further sign of its notability. If a fact is challenged for truthfulness, the process should work the same way. Consensus. Lfstevens (talk) 18:00, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Update 5 years later

[edit]

Since 2014, 3007 reports have appeared of which 53 are classified as reviews. --Smokefoot (talk) 14:20, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]