Talk:Tunguska (The X-Files)

Tunguska (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Tunguska (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 4) series, a good topic. It is also part of the Mythology of The X-Files, Volume 2 series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 24, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
July 26, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted
July 14, 2013	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage / The X-Files Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the X-Files task force (assessed as High-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tunguska (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 17:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Again, "The episode is one of those which helped to explore the series' overarching mythology." I feel this is kind of a clunky why to write this, maybe say "The episode helps to explore and expand the series' overarching mythology."
Fixed. GRAPPLE X 03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LEAD, no summary or mention of production
Fixed. GRAPPLE X 03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just before the lead plot summary, maybe add, "In this episode..." I think it helps to separate fact from fiction
Fixed. GRAPPLE X 03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"FBI special agentFox Mulder" space between 'agent' and 'Fox'
Appears to have been fixed. GRAPPLE X 03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"His parter Dana Scully (Gillian Anderson)m" remove 'm' after 'Anderson)'
Fixed. GRAPPLE X 03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox, maybe cite where you found all the guests stars at the very bottom, maybe after "Tegan Moss as Young Dana Scully" Is there a way to put a cite after the words "Guest stars"?
Fixed. GRAPPLE X 03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Probably no need to wikilink and parenthesis who played who in the plot section if they are in the lead

"...infecting him with the oily black worms" I would just write "infecting with the black oil." But to each his own
Fixed. GRAPPLE X 03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"They decided to create a story which had connections to the Russian gulags, which led" two 'which's right after each other
Fixed. GRAPPLE X 03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"and it was felt that this two-part story was a good place to expand upon this as it allowed the production crew to "stretch the limits" of their resources and imagination." rewrite into "and it was felt that this two-part story was a good place to expand upon this, allowing the production crew to "stretch the limits" of their resources and imagination."
Fixed. GRAPPLE X 03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to my copy of I Want to Believe, the episode was viewed by 18.85 million viewers and not households.
I see you got that one already. GRAPPLE X 03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
All good
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Thorough coverage, no sign of trivia
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Neural POV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
No edit warring
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
One picture, properly tagged. Are there any other free pictures to spice up the production section, it's kind of boring right now?
Stuck one in of the Allan Hills rock that inspired the episode. GRAPPLE X 03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed.--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:56, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Looks good, I pass.--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]