Talk:Tupolev Tu-85
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tupolev Tu-85 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tupolev Tu-85 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 20, 2009. |
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tupolev Tu-85/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 01:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- prose: (MoS):
- prose: (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
-
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]1. Link for DoD.
- Done.
2. Link for Shvetsov design
- Done.
3. Do the aspect ratio numbers need any conversion templates?
- No, they're ratios.
4. Change ventral to central
- No, ventral means belly-mounted, but I've linked it.
5. Suggest a link for dorsal
- Done.
6. 85/2 was incorporated the lessons learned from the first aircraft. Suggest - 85/2 incorporated the lessons learned from the first aircraft,
- Good catch. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 01:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Passed. Thurgate (talk) 00:34, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- GA-Class aviation articles
- GA-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- GA-Class Soviet aviation articles
- Soviet aviation task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- GA-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- GA-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- GA-Class Russia articles
- Low-importance Russia articles
- Low-importance GA-Class Russia articles
- GA-Class Russia (technology and engineering) articles
- Technology and engineering in Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles