Talk:Turf War (The Office)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 01:21, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I will begin reviewing this article as soon as I get a chance!--Dom497 (talk) 01:21, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Quality of the article is good.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Everything looks good for this section of the review.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Everything looks good here.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   All statements have reliable sources.

   C. No original research:

   No original research found within the article.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   All major aspects of the topic have been covered.

   B. Focused:

   Information remains focused to the article topic.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   No bias found.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   There are no edit wars but the info within the article is changing on a daily basis. I will wait for a few days to see what happens, then come to a conclusion for this section. Article is stable enough.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Image licenses look good.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Picture is appropriate and has a good caption.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 00:17, 17 May 2012 (UTC)