Talk:Turner Falls

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Waterfalls task force.

Oklahoma Low‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Despammed[edit]

The previous version read like an ad. I trimmed it a bit. It still needs 3rd-party sources. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 05:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of 2009-08-16[edit]

I reverted several recent edits because: 1) they are unsourced, 2) it contains significant amounts of opinion and sentences that are not in an encyclopedic tone of voice, 3) the text sounds like it might have been taken from a travel brochure or something similar, or is written in the tone of a travel brocure and 4) the editor's other recent edit to Dougherty, Oklahoma was reverted for similar reasons. I encourage the editor to re-write this with just the facts and with citations from reliable sources. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 05:08, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article reclassification[edit]

This article meets the requirements for Start class. Bruin2 (talk) 15:55, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1909 Photo[edit]

I have found a 1909 photograph of Turner Falls when transcribing "Oklahoma Arbor and Bird Day, Friday, March Twelfth, 1909" for Wikisource. Would you think it's appropriate to add it to the article?

VGPaleontologist (talk) 16:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@VGPaleontologist Certainly could use it in the article. Dcheagle • talk • contribs 22:04, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]