Talk:Turquoise parrot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleTurquoise parrot is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 12, 2016.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 10, 2014Good article nomineeListed
October 20, 2014Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 25, 2013.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Turquoise Parrot (female pictured) was formerly used as pie-filling?
Current status: Featured article

Conservation status[edit]

I have read this species is classed as vulnerable. Will find hte refs onlineCas Liber 20:42, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The text does not support the rank of endangered, the species is not on CITES I (see http://www.parrotsinternational.org/CITES_page.htm) and is IUCN listed as least concern (see http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/142520/0) Merlark (talk) 04:34, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Turquoise parrot/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 13:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi, I'll review this article. You might be puzzled by why you didn't have to wait for a month before getting a review, but I've written so many articles about extinct parrots lately that I thought it would be interesting to read something about an extant one... FunkMonk (talk) 13:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, 'insanely grateful' might be a more apt description...but hey Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The video doesn't seem relevant under feeding, and doesn't really add much, compared to some of the unused photos, for example. FunkMonk (talk) 13:33, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good point - will have a look and shuffle.... Cas Liber (talk · contribs)
  • For a start, the article feels a little empty, sure no other images here could be added?[1] FunkMonk (talk) 13:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Added a couple. Am not keen on using lots of captivity ones with cages in them. Also they are some off solour variants. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:19, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I understand the concern, but there doesn't seem to be a clear image of a male anywhere in the article. Perhaps consider one of these?[2][3][4] Also, you could add the "upright" parameter to the vertical images, so they don't take up so much space. FunkMonk (talk) 15:04, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Any range map? I could make one, if you provide a source. FunkMonk (talk) 13:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Damn...forgot about that. Will double check on sources but I need to get to sleep now...late here. Back tomorrow.rangemap added now Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:19, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The synonyms need dates, and not sure why Bechstein isn't spelled out? FunkMonk (talk) 13:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dates added - aaah as a botanist he's abbreivated and zoologist he's not..interesting Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:05, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
nice find - added Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:30, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article doesn't clarify whether the authors of the synonyms were aware that it had been described already?
I haven't seen a secondary source discussing this. Will take a look at the descriptions and see what else there is. Levaillant doesn't say much at all, from what I can discern from my rudimentary French... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:42, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "the species name being the Medieval Latin word azureus "blue"." Needs a source.
added Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:34, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Invalid subspecies should be listed in the taxobox as synonyms as well.
added Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:39, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The name red-shouldered parakeet was incorrectly applied to this species." What does it apply to then?
the source doesn't say on that page, however I will check something else. aaah paradise parrot... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:46, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Its neck and upperparts are grass-green, and tail is grass-green with yellow borders" Never seen a sentence like this, is it correct English?
See, as a native English speaker, it seems natural to me - however, I have a tendency of dropping words a bit much for most people. Happy to go with consensus and ask some others. tweaked now Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:39, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm no native speaker, so I trust that you know better. FunkMonk (talk) 14:49, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The throat and chest are pale green and belly is yellow." Same here?
tweaked now Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:10, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "and has been recorded as black while nesting." Any explanation why?
none that I could find Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:40, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Juvenile birds of both sexes have less extensive blue faces" Blue on their faces?
added Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:39, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Their eyes open by day seven, and they are covered with grey down by day seven or eight." Wouldn't this fit better under breeding or behaviour?
moved Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:39, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Previously it had been recorded as far north as the Suttor River and Mackay." When is previously?
pre 1945 - tweaked Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:24, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "it vanished from much of its range" Why?
I've written about what it in the conservation section - the populations do seem to vary wildly, but there has been alot of clearing that has removed nesting sites (they need to be in mature trees). Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:06, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "That year, many aviary species including several species of Australian parrot and members of the genus Neophema had exhibited neurological symptoms reminiscent of Newcastle disease." Sounds weird it was only that year, what happened since?
I have no idea - I don't recall any specific years since getting coverage as such. It seems as though there are sporadic outbreaks among parrots in captivity in general. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:54, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The lead seems a bit short for an article of this length.
lead expanded Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:00, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Alright, fixes look good. Only point remaining is whether a clear image if a male should be added? There's a good one of the female, but none of the male. These appear to be our best ones:[5][6][7] FunkMonk (talk) 14:07, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
One added now - some birds in captivity have more orangey colour than wild ones usually have - so picked the most natural/default-looking one... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:41, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, the sources look solid, I'll go ahead and promote this. The range map could need a full citation on the Commons page, otherwise hard to know what publication "Higgins" refers to. FunkMonk (talk) 20:49, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gum trees[edit]

From the lead section, paragraph 2: " It nests in hollows of gum trees." In this context, are gum trees the same as Eucalyptus? Eucalyptus was mentioned earlier in the article. If they are the same, it would be helpful to clarify this. Axl ¤ [Talk] 10:37, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scapulars[edit]

From "Taxonomy and naming", paragraph 2: "In 1915, Gregory Mathews described a subspecies dombrainii from Victoria on the basis of more prominent red on the scapulars." What is a "scapular"? (I can guess, but this needs to be clarified.) Wikipedia's article is inappropriate. Axl ¤ [Talk] 10:53, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo[edit]

The "Description" section does not currently have a photo. How about moving the photo of an adult male in Twycross Zoo from the "Distribution and habitat" section the the "Description" section? Axl ¤ [Talk] 11:00, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conservation status[edit]

From "Conservation status", paragraph 1: "The species is not listed as threatened on the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999." Should this be: "The species is listed as not threatened."? Axl ¤ [Talk] 11:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Young[edit]

In "Behaviour", subsection "Breeding", would it be reasonable to change "young" and "baby birds" to "chicks"? Axl ¤ [Talk] 11:26, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aviculture[edit]

In "Aviculture": " A quiet species, it likes to bathe in captivity." There is a disconnect between the two parts of the sentence. Axl ¤ [Talk] 11:28, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Turquoise parrot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]