Talk:Tyet

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Egypt: Egyptian religion Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Egyptian religion work group (assessed as Low-importance).

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Africa: Sudan

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sudan (assessed as Mid-importance).

Proposed merge

I oppose the proposed merger with the article on Isis, partly because a passage in The Origins of Osiris and His Cult by J. Gwyn Griffiths assumes that the symbol was not originally connected with her. Additionally, it seems to imply that an early example dates to First Dynasty, centuries before Isis' first solid attestation in the Fifth Dynasty, though his wording is somewhat ambiguous. I'll copy what he says on page 40, with relevant footnotes in parentheses:

An interesting find was made by Zaki Y. Saad (Royal Excavations at Saqqara and Helwan (1941–1945), 27 and Pl. 14b) in a tomb of the First Dynasty at Helwân—two ivory pieces which, in his opinion, form the most ancient example of the djed-pillar, which in turn he describes as "the symbol of the god Osiris'. The djed-pillar, however, is not consistently an Osirian symbol, at least not in its early forms. Only in the New Kingdom does it become unambiguously Osirian. Even so, do these pieces represent djed-pillars? They seem to imitate papyrus-columns, with four papyrus flowers imposed over the other. It may equally be doubted whether the ivory toilet spoon is 'a symbol of the goddess Isis', or again the knot represented on the adjacent box lid. (It is fair to add that some scholars accept Saad's claims… Against this, see Helck, 'Osiris', 481. The Isis-knot, of course, is not originally distinctively Isiac: see H. Schäfer, ZÄS 62 (1927), 108–110.)

The Schäfer source is most relevant here, and I managed to track it down: "Das sogenannte „Blut der Isis" und das Zeichen „Leben“". Only the first page of the paper is publicly accessible, though, so we can't see most of Schäfer's argument without access to ZÄS. A 1927 source isn't ideal in Egyptology, as studies of Egyptian religion have changed greatly since then, but I don't know of any more recent sources that discuss the original meaning of the tyet.

All that detail is rather tangential to the merge discussion, but it shows that the tyet may not have originally been just a symbol of Isis and there are some ambiguities about it that probably deserve some discussion in the article. This article will always be fairly small, but I don't think it's doomed to be a stub forever. Isis, in contrast, is a sprawling subject whose article I just recently expanded, reflecting the reams and reams of scholarly literature. There's no reason to force the content of this small but not tiny article into one that has many other subtopics to discuss. A. Parrot (talk) 01:57, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]