Talk:Type 39 torpedo boat

Type 39 torpedo boat has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 3, 2019. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Type 39 torpedo boat article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge?[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Closed: No rationale, no support. Xyl 54 (talk) 22:31, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I confess I'm a bit hesitant on merges, because I tend to think individual ships deserve separate treatment. Pending more information on T-25's history, I don't object in this case, 'cause the page was mainly a creation to take OT material off the U-505 page to begin with. ;p TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 13:33, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to point out there was some overlap with page information. I will let others more active in this topic decide what is best to do.--Traveler100 (talk) 14:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the merger proposal. The better thing would be for this stub to be improved. Warships are notable, and individual ship articles are superior to redirects to class articles. Manxruler (talk) 20:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge, warships are generally considered notable. T25 article is a viable stub. MKFI (talk) 13:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've closed this: There's no support for the proposal, but as there's no rationale given, it probably didn't even warrant discussing. Xyl 54 (talk) 22:28, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.