Talk:Typebar
Typebar's illustrating picture is not suited to the evidence for David's statements on two points.
-
Jamming typebars on front-strike machine and with too much tangles
This picture is front-strike machine's and staged event 'cause of too much tangles.
Jamming typebars' picture should be on up-strike-machine's and during actual operation. It's because this picture should illustrate David's statements.
The type-writing machine at prototype era, it should have up-strike mechanism.
--Raycy (talk) 17:07, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
David wrote new doc that is David(2000)[1], and I haven't read though. It should be checked because his "jamming problems led to QWERTY" theory was on suspicion for a while.--Raycy (talk) 18:15, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Associate Professor Koichi Yasuoka[2] points out two facts that should be proven ,
- The existence of the nuisance of type-bar collisions [3]
- Strong regulation between keys' layout and type-bars' arrangement [4]
,during the prototype-machine era.--Raycy (talk) 18:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Yasuoka also says up-strike machine's type-bar should never been called as 'arm'. I gess it might be called as 'arm'.--Raycy (talk) 18:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Path dependence
[edit]David said path dependence with showing QWERTY as the evidence.
It is like the "jubaku" ; spelled binding phenomena ;phenomena spell bound with; .
拘束条件 condition of constraint // restraint condition
binding on physics, binding on code table structure
呪縛-THE JUBAKUHaunted Forest (film)
紙テープの呪縛 paper tape（Yasuoka）
テレタイプの呪い teletype（Yasuoka）, 5-bit rellay bindng
Early in the QWERTY's borning , there were the results of traveling typebars around on the typebasket , every bar wired or linked to the each key with. Surviving the vital motion of typebars to the last, along or on the vertical plane much freely.(Raycy)--Raycy (talk) 04:17, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
References
[edit]- ^ David, Paul A. (2000), "Path dependence, its critics and the quest for ‘historical economics’", in P. Garrouste and S. Ioannides (eds), Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas: Past and Present, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, England.
- ^ http://www.blogger.com/profile/12846940796427466327
- ^ Current(1949)footnote26
- ^ Current(1949)footnote22
See also
[edit]- Path dependence —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raycy (talk • contribs) 03:42, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
For explaining David's QWERTY statement is important
[edit]The typebararticle's ballance paying for David's is good, I agree. If affirm or not, David's idea should be explaned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raycy (talk • contribs) 05:48, 11 September 2009 (UTC)