Talk:Typhoon Ewiniar (2006)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Typhoon Ewiniar (2006) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Typhoon Ewiniar (2006) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 28, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
October 13, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
March 3, 2008	Good article reassessment	Kept
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 10, 2024.
Current status: Good article

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific High‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as High-importance).

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan: Geography & environment / History / Ryukyu Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 13:49, November 4, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Geography and environment task force.

This article is supported by the History task force.

This article is supported by the Ryukyu task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Todo

Good work on this. The only todo I can think of is put it up for a GA nom, unless you have other plans first. --Hurricanehink (talk) 12:41, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't, actually. This is pretty much done, unless NWS Guam gets back to me with more info. Chacor 13:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA-nommed. Chacor 04:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ewiniar Redeemed?

Hey, I thought everyone merged Ewiniar to the 2006 Pacific typhoon season but how come it came back, and how did it, and who did it? Alastor Moody _(talk) 08:29, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We unmerged it because we found a lot of info on the storm after it had died, so we created an article. All the better for Wikipedia, if we can get good-quality articles in. I mean, honestly, which do you think is better, Choice A or Choice B? Chacor 10:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chacor's right. Articles are too hard to make while they are current. The good stuff comes from after the fact, when we know what the storm is going to do. --Hurricanehink (talk) 12:47, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Passed

Good job everyone. Another hurricane article on the GA list. Tarret 14:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NCDC

The article should be updated using NCDC info for Guam. They have a damage total and some more info in general. Hurricanehink (talk) 14:49, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Nothing. Guam was never affected by Ewiniar, btw. WFO Guam were involved as their AOR includes CNMI, Micronesia and Palau. – Ch acor 15:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should have looked at NCDC, as I said. $105,000 in damage, due to storm surge and minor crop damage. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:19, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to update the access dates of the website sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Typhoon Ewiniar (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://eng.nema.go.kr/sub/cms3/3_3.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:32, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Typhoon Ewiniar (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]