Jump to content

Talk:Typhoon Wutip (2019)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Wutip (2019)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: JCMLuis (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 21:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will complete this review within one week. -Riley1012 (talk) 21:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written

  • Per MOS:ALLCAPS, the references with all-caps titles (ref. 6 and the first two words in ref. 40 and 61) should be changed
  • ...however, post-season analysis determined that it had attain winds of 270 km/h... change "attain" to "attained"
  • ...Wutip did not held this intensity for long... change "held" to "hold"
  • Cloud tops warmed up as the eye was becoming cloud-filled. change "was becoming" to "became"
  • Upon completion the next day, the eyewall thickened and its associated convection... add a comma after "thickened"
  • Wutip was most powerful typhoon in the month of February on record,... add "the" before "most"
  • Residents of Satawal, Lamotrek, Elato, Faraulep, and Piig necessitated water assistance, as their drinking source were soon to be exhausted.
  • Overall, Wutip caused heavy preliminary damage in infrastructure and agriculture that costed at least $2 million. change "costed" to "cost"
  • Wutip dumped 43 cm (17 in) of rain in Inarajan, 30 cm (12 in) in Dandan, and 15 to 20 cm (6 to 8 in) elsewhere in the island. change "in the island" to "on the island"
  • No injury or serious damage were reported... change the sentence to "No injuries or serious damages were reported"
  • No injuries were reported and public roadways across the islands remained clear of debris. add a comma after "reported"
  • ...with the support of the International Organization for Migration (IOM) and Red Cross. add "the" before "Red Cross"
  • Elimo later revised his declaration on March 2, emphasizing the extensive damages Wutip had caused towards infrastructure, food crops, and water sources. change "towards" to "to"

2. Verifiable

  • Earwig's Copyvio check shows some close paraphrasing from ref. 40 that should be changed.
    An executive order was issued for Chuuk State to activate their command post on February 20–21, before reports of fallen trees, flooding, and damaged homes came through. Displaced people near the shorelines were evacuated to typhoon shelters. Both sentences should be reworded.
  • Dead links: 3 (change to |url-status=dead)
  • The |url= parameter in ref. 49 needs to be changed to this URL. The current link takes you to a search page.
  • Spot check: 1, 4, 6, 9, 19, 34, 37, 43, 45, 54, 59, 65

3. Broad
The article covers all major aspects and is focused.

4. Neutral
The article is neutral.

5. Stable
This article is stable day-to-day.

6. Illustrated
The images in the article are in the public domain and have relevant captions.

@JCMLuis: I've completed the review. Let me know when you've made the suggested changes. -Riley1012 (talk) 15:43, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Riley1012: I have addressed all but one concern which you seemed to have forgot to add a suggestion to. luis 💬 16:22, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JCMLuis: Sorry for that mistake. The sentence should say "drinking sources" instead of "drinking source" -Riley1012 (talk) 16:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done luis 💬 16:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 23:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by JCMLuis (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

luis 💬 16:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]