Talk:U.S. Army hand and arm signals

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the U.S. Army hand and arm signals article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of hand signals be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

The rest of the world

What about military hand and arm signals for the rest of the world? The US army only represents a small percentage of soldiers worldwide.203.184.41.226 (talk) 23:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 December 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to U.S. Army hand and arm signals. This article is clearly about the U.S. Army (not any other branch of the military) and it would be grammatically strange to move the page to U.S. Army military hand and arm signals. Per the MOS, "U.S." is the common abbreviation of "United States". Biblioworm 21:29, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Military hand and arm signals → US Army military hand and arm signals – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. 98.122.20.56 (talk) 06:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

rename WP:TITLE there are many military hand/arm signals, such as used on US Navy aircraft carriers, etc. The title should reflect the scope and content of the article, which the proposed name does. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 23:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to U.S. Army military hand and arm signals (with dots) per the common abbreviation used in the U.S. (as described in MOS:U.S.). —BarrelProof (talk) 04:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to U.S. Army hand and arm signals. We don't really need military along with army, which is a bit tautological. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, that's better. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:47, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename to U.S. Military hand and arm signals. I agree Necrothesp - the use of both 'army' and 'military' is superfluous. I'm given to understand that the word 'Army' in reference to the US is often regarded as being a reference to infantry only (to the exclusion of the Navy and Airforce). In other places, the word 'army' is a catch-all to describe a whole national military structure. In that case, perhaps a better suggestion might be to rename as U.S. Military hand and arm signals. I'm not sure about the capitalisation of the word 'military' though. --98.122.20.56 (talk) 18:03, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - "Military" should not be capitalized, as "U.S. Military" is not the proper name of a specific organization. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:57, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - U.S. Military refers to the whole armed forces. U.S. Army only to the ground warfare branch of those forces. This is the case in almost every country. Since this article refers only to the signal system in use in the U.S. Army that would be the appropriate term. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:09, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - So the current suggestion has returned to U.S. Army hand and arm signals, per Necrothesp's statement that these signals are specific to the U.S. Army, as they are not used by all U.S. military forces. Any objections? —BarrelProof (talk) 17:22, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Cleanup

I just did a little cleanup of the reference. Both were broken and both were really the same reference. I’d still call this a stub. —¿philoserf? (talk) 19:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]