This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Languages

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles

Slanted article[edit]

Untitled[edit]

The current leadership section contains no relevant data about the organization US English, and seems to laboriously assert that the current leader is not a bigoted white male. This is not a PR page and it shouldn't be written like one.

Untitled[edit]

The link to the SPLC gives the entire text of the memo and no commentary on it, while the link to Crawford's book excerpt (which incidentally I never removed) provides only a short quote from it and plenty of partisan commentary from the author. It is entirely appropriate to provide readers the chance to read the entire memo. If you have a different page with the entire text of the memo on it, then of course you can replace the SPLC link with that. Angr (talk • contribs) 13:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The topic of English as a national language tends to be polarizing along conservative/liberal, anti immigration/pro minorty, exclusive/inclusive, "accountability-freedom"/ "entitlement-politically correct” etc lines.

As a long time admirer of S I Hayakawa and his clear thinking about complex issues I would be grateful for any quotes or references to his comments regarding his reasons for advocating English as the “official” national language. Jlmackel (talk) 17:11, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]