Talk:USS Ampere

USS Ampere has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 11, 2017. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USS Ampere article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Table of Commanders[edit]

Does the table really need to be sortable?Pennsy22 (talk) 03:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Ampere/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 19:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this in the next couple of days. Although at first read it looks a bit skimpy for GA....auntieruth (talk) 19:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

I'm not liking the way your citations are listed. There is no author, no date of the page, (different from Accessed on...) It's not possible to evaluate the veracity of sources (citations and bib) the way you have them listed. See, for example, USS_Chicago_(CA-136).

They use SFN refs. If you look at bibliography you will see both sources. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 04:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What does degaussing mean? I understand what it is, but how did a ship do that? Were there others? What did they do?

Cheers, auntieruth (talk) 19:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm asking for a second opinion on content for this. auntieruth (talk) 16:13, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]