Jump to content

Talk:USS Asheville (SSN-758)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Seeking Information on USS Asheville

[edit]

If you have any information on the USS Asheville (SSN-758) please send it to me at subman758@aol.com. I would really like to complete the list of COB's, and Find out the Missing XO's Names.--Subman758 (talk) 05:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to update the Awards section. Also if you have any pictures, and would like them posted, we can also do a Photo Gallery.--Subman758 (talk) 05:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you are a crew member of the USS Asheville, I welcome your input, but please respect this page. I am a former crew member of the Asheville, and I would like to keep this page up to Asheville Standards. Thank You.--Subman758 (talk) 05:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remember what WP:OWN says. -MBK004 16:45, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let's not kill the goose "Idioms: kill the goose that lays the golden eggs".. Compare this article with the flagship of the Los Angeles class--a ship that certainly has more publicly verifiable references than Asheville--and I think we can agree that some data without citations is still valuable. If we must, mark <fact, citation needed, etc.> so innocent readers will be warned, but at least the framework for improvement is in place.

Perhaps the roster of XO and Goat Locker are bordering on trivia, though. Respectfully Subman758, wikipedia might not be the best venue for your intentions (e.g.; is the roster of XO and Goat Lockers on other boats significant to you?) but I do appreciate your contribution. Stevecalloway (talk) 12:03, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OPSEC

[edit]

I'm not Navy, I'm Air Force, but nevertheless, do you really think that publicly identifying your shipmates on something that can (and is) read globally by anybody is a good idea? If this were my unit my CO would have my hide for this. Just something to think about, fella. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.213.207.141 (talk) 23:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Historical value?

[edit]

Much of the narrative in the history section of this article is of no historical value. I question whether future generations will be enriched by the knowledge that on a day in August 1999, the crew ate hamburgers, or that in April 2000, they went swimming. Thest things may be true and relevant, but constitute a level of detail appropriate only for letters to Mom, not for an encyclopedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.14.46.66 (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on USS Asheville (SSN-758). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:01, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on USS Asheville (SSN-758). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:49, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link replaced with archive URL, others are fine. Iggy (Swan) 12:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]