Talk:USS Congress (1799)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleUSS Congress (1799) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 5, 2009Good article nomineeListed
October 13, 2009WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
December 1, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 2, 2010Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008[edit]

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:08, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A note about this article[edit]

This Congress is apparently the ship that no one cared enough to write about. You will see the amount of books in the bibliography and believe me when I say there isn't much out there about this ship. I've exhausted all references available to me and as you can see there are still some large gaps in her service career. At least I was able to almost double the article size from where it was previously. --Brad (talk) 00:00, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference not needed. name=Long>Long, David Foster (©1988). "Chapter Nine". Gold braid and foreign relations : diplomatic activities of U.S. naval officers, 1798-1883. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. pp. 207ff. ISBN 9780870212284. Retrieved April 29, 2012. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |laydate= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |laysummary= ignored (help): p.208  --Pawyilee (talk) 01:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on USS Congress (1799). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]