Jump to content

Talk:Ulster Schools' Cup

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Article Contradiction: "By far the most successful schools have been Methodist College Belfast [32], Royal Belfast Academical Institution [29] and Campbell College [26]."

And the Table Performance by School"


"Methodist College Belfast 30 2 24 56"

Which is it ?

  • I have removed this portion of the article. It was pointing out obvious information that is available in the Performance Table anyway. I have left in the 17 different winners statement as this saves the reader the bother of counting (if they were interested!). I have also checked the accuracy of the table and made necessary corrections. The article is still in need of clean up - particularly the section on filming etc - difficult to source?? Also does anyone have an opinion about adding in the details of past Subsidiary, Bowl and Trophy finals to the article - I have details of about 95% of these at present. Is this the correct place for them?Weejack48 09:15, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Would it be good to include a small flag/ tile containing the school colours beside each School in the finals table? This would make it easier to see trends etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.165.208 (talk) 16:31, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ulster Schools' Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]