This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
@HapHaxion just to bring the issue here instead of reverting each other's edits. I don't really understand why you're not fine with my additions: there are countless cases of parties that do not explicitly mention their ideology in their program, but that can still get easily inferred from the individual proposals. If those proposals match a third way economic approach, why shouldn't we add it in the infobox? Fm3dici97 (talk) 09:05, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which cases? Generally that violates WP:OR and those claims can't be definitively verified from that alone. HapHaxion(talk / contribs) 14:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
