Talk:Union Square station (Somerville)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Trains2050 (talk · contribs) 08:48, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I will be revewing this article over the next few days, please see the table bellow on my progress in the review. Thank you for nominating this article Trains2050 (talk) 08:48, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
General notes
[edit]- With the opening 1 month away, is there an exact opening date?
- Frustratingly, no. I'll be adding that the moment it's announced.
- "This was delayed in June 2021 to a December 2021 opening, and in October 2021 to a March 2022 opening" Specific reason on why it was delayed? Covid?
Done Added the listed reasons.
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
|
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | seems good |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | seems good |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Seems good |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | Seems good |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | seems good |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | very good coverage |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | sticks to the topic |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | seems good |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | no edit wars currently |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | good alt text and own work |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | all good |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. | On hold until changes are made
|