Talk:United Nations General Assembly Resolution 31/72

Environment: Sustainability High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sustainability task force.

On MadmanBot's notice[edit]

In contrary to what MadamBots suggests I have not referred to atomicarchive.com as indicated in the reference section of the article. The two references used are from the Government (U.S. Department of State) and Intergovernmental Organization (UN Office in Geneva) sources with public domain status. I believe the site in question (atomicarchive.com) has made a perfect copy of that of the U.S. Department of State.--Etranger (talk) 05:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Etranger. Thank you for explaining the origin of the text - makes things on our end a lot easier. :) I just wanted to let you know that in accordance with Wikipedia:Plagiarism there's some annotation that needs doing when you copy content from a public domain source. It's really helpful in avoiding misunderstandings, since there are a lot of people who reuse government content.

Unfortunately, though, the UN is not public domain. I wish they were, but for some reason they choose to reserve copyright. If you click the "copyright" status at the bottom of http://www.unog.ch/enmod, you'll see "Copyright © United Nations 2009". Their terms explicitly forbid non-commercial use and modification. :( The article contains some close paraphrasing from that UN source and needs to be modified to comply with our copyright policies. Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing includes some suggestions for how this is done.

Beyond that, every quotation needs an inline citation per policy - Wikipedia:Verifiability says "All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material." I see there are quite a few quotes in this page. Can you please add inline citations for those so that we can retain them? :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:58, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United Nations Convention on Environmental Modification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]