Talk:United Nations Plaza (Bucharest)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 3 November 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. UN Plaza will redirect to a new dab page. Cúchullain t/c 15:49, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]



UN PlazaUnited Nations Plaza (Bucharest) – Make United Nations Plaza a three-way disambiguation page for the three items (at least) covered in the current page's hatnote, with UN Plaza a redirect to that disambiguation page. The present name is malformed per WP:ACRONYMTITLE, being an informal abbreviation of a translation, and not the proper name (or the most common name) of the location in Romania (nor of any other). The present micro-stub on that location is also not the primary topic for the names "UN Plaza" or "United Nations Plaza" in English; the location in San Francisco clearly is, as easily demonstrated by searching for either of those quoted strings at Google News. United Nations Plaza, San Francisco (among other redirs) is presently covered as a subtopic at Civic Center, San Francisco, but could easily be a separate article (again, just the Google News hits alone are sufficient to demonstrate notability and to provide article creation fodder). The stub on the Bucharest location is also mis-focused. It is dwelling on a particular building (properly the United Nations Plaza Building, in English, when the plaza itself (Piața Națiunile Unite in Romanian) is more notable, and the building on it is a subtopic of that. I've already created every sane redirect for both location in English, and in Romanian for the Romanian one.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  06:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support In ictu oculi (talk) 08:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, seems the San Francisco historical site would be the primary. Randy Kryn 22:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support move. I doubt there would be a single primary topic here.  ONR  (talk)  00:28, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.