Talk:United States Army Cyber Command

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the United States Army Cyber Command article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Keeping ARCYBER and 2nd Army Separate[edit]

I figured I'd kick the ball on this. Someone will eventually ask if the ARCYBER and 2nd Army Article should be merged. My gut instinct is that they should stay separate. ARCYBER as a name, may fade into something else in the future, but 2nd Army has already been resurrected a few times. Should the articles be kept separate? Rbcwa (talk) 03:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

INSCOM relationship to 1st IO CMD (L) and 780th MI Brigade[edit]

I am curious about the reporting relationship of 1st Information Operations Command and the 780th Military Intelligence Brigade. Both the commands seem related to INSCOM but I think they may both OPCON to Army Cyber. I've done some digging to figure out their reporting relationship, but I haven't been able to find any public references yet. Is anyone else aware of a public reference on the 1st IO CMD (L) and 780th MI Brigade reporting relationships? TIA Rbcwa (talk) 19:21, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Theoretically, all Army Cyber units fall under ARCYBER. Intel units may additionally fall under INSCOM. Reporting requirements would likely depend on the mission. For Cyber actions they would report to ARCYBER, for intel issues, INSCOM. Again, this is my opinion, from my experience. Sephiroth storm (talk) 14:42, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]