Talk:United States congressional delegations from South Carolina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jimbo Wales has requested that we try to improve Joe Wilson (U.S. politician) for the reasons he stated on Talk:Joe Wilson (U.S. politician). I put in a few hours but can't think of anything else, except a photo or two which we are unlikely to get permissions for over the weekend. Please see if you can improve the article any further. --James S. 10:46, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Colors[edit]

We have to put in party designations. Color-blind readers can't necessarily see them. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Formatting issues. Color can be left in, but we need to have also the (D) and (R) for the parties.—Mark Adler (markles) 21:15, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Minor error on page[edit]

The chart shows Alva Lumpkin and Roger peace as splitting the 77th Congress, and Burnet Maybank as serving in the 78th through 82nd Congresses. In fact, Burnet Maybank served in part of the 77th Congress as well as the 78th through 82nd. The 77th should be split 3 ways, with the third part (Maybank's) extending down. I'm not sure how to fix the HTML though, since the table code in rather complex. Any help would be appreciated. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 18:35, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MIA[edit]

Paul G. McCorkle is missing. [1]--Appraiser 21:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Corinne Boyd Riley is missing [2]--Appraiser 15:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

6th/7th districts[edit]

This page makes it appear that rice replaced Clyburn as the representative from the 6th district, however, it seems that south carolina actually has 7 districts, and clyburn is still in office. What is the actual composition of the south carolina's current congressional delegation?

24.220.190.225 (talk) 06:24, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United States congressional delegations from South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:36, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]