Jump to content

Talk:Upcoming

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Competitors

[edit]

Is there a list of competing event databases?

I'll add them. Good catch. Airplaneman 03:46, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed this claim in the section: "Many competitors have emerged since Upcoming was launched in 2003, including Eventful." As of today, there is no listing of these, and no reference supporting the claim. At most, we're seeing three competitors listed (Eventful, Last.fm and iLike). I do not believe that the word "many" would be commonly applied to a list that short. So, isn't this original research, and other bad things? Bookmarking (talk) 10:05, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Bookmarking[reply]
OK, I've removed the claim that many competitors had emerged, and changed it to "at least one", the link to Eventful, perhaps, being acceptable as a reference? Even that's a reach, but let's not turn this into a revert war. I slightly changed this sentence - "Music sites later branched out into this space, such as last.fm and iLike, building on their knowledge of their users' tastes" - replacing "music sites" with "some of the music sites". The prose doesn't flow as nicely, but under the old phrasing, the sentence could be read as meaning that all music sites were doing this. Do we know that this is true? If not, should the phrasing not be clear enough, that an original research claim could not reasonably be read into the passage? Or am I just being a royal pain? Bookmarking (talk) 10:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Bookmarking[reply]
Belated, but just noticed this, and I've done some research in the past, and may still be interesting to someone:

Active competitors (in some sense) in the music field (in addition to those already mentioned):

I'm sure there's quite a few that are not music-specific, but my interests didn't cover that. There's also a dozen or more that have came-and-went in the last decade or so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsammon (talkcontribs) 05:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Upcoming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:37, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]