Talk:Utah State Route 103/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   There is some WP:OVERLINKing at work here. All of the references do not need links to UDOT. Only the first link needs it. Also, there needs to be a WP:NBSP between 22,525 and cars.

    Done --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 01:22, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Broad enough for .225 miles of highway that is only 43 years old.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   No photos. I'd like to see something to illustrate the article at some point.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Some minor fixes and it will pass.

Imzadi1979 (talk) 01:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Issues fixed and passed Imzadi1979 (talk) 01:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)