Talk:Utopia (cruise ship)

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

liner or cruise ship?[edit]

Should this article be renamed "Utopia (cruise ship)"? From what I've seen, this vessel is not going to be an ocean liner, which make voyages on a regular schedule between two points for the purposes of transporting passengers and cargo. Utopia seems like she's going to be a cruise ship, and her builder, Samsung Heavy Industries, says as much, referring to her as a cruise ship on their page. (link: http://www.shi.samsung.co.kr/Eng/pr/news_view.aspx?Seq=764&mac=36a0b76dbaf60a1dd411b5f34dd4b940) Any thoughts on this? C628 (talk) 23:03, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, whatever. It's been two months, no reply; I'll go ahead and move it. C628 (talk) 18:44, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Um, this doesn't even actually exist…why is there an article?Stenen Bijl (talk) 09:38, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Utopia (cruise ship). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110717093504/http://www.travelpulse.com/Resources/Editorial.aspx?n=64193 to http://www.travelpulse.com/Resources/Editorial.aspx?n=64193

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A classic crystal ball article?[edit]

Thirteen years on and they still haven't signed a shipbuilding contract, only a "letter of intent"! And nothing at all reported for five years. Davidships (talk) 10:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]