Talk:Uttam Khobragade

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 January 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Adarsha scam[edit]

Why no mention of the Adarsha building scam, this fellow is a notoriously corrupt bureaucrat whose daughter Devyani Khobragade was arrested on Visa fraud charges. 117.195.83.65 (talk) 14:17, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Biased and Untrue Edits[edit]

Appears that edits of users who highlight Uttam Khobragade's scams and controversies are getting deleted or covered up by text that glorifies him. The glorifying text is poorly sourced,and does not adhere to Wiki's standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiUser125468965 (talk • contribs) 05:55, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notable[edit]

Everything ion the media is not notable for a WP article. This article lists nothing gmore than his resume (career section). And controversies is clearly in violation of BLP as an accusation. Only notability is that of his daughter.(Lihaas (talk) 03:24, 16 January 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

The article existed long before his daughter's recent problems. I agree that there are serious BLP issues, many of which have appeared recently. He may be notable for himself, and is not notable for his daughters case, which is why I think a redirect there is wrong. I suggest that if you think he is not notable enough for a wikipedia entry, then take it to AfD. Martin451 03:38, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But im not saying it should be deleted altogether. A redirect, i feel, is best here.(Lihaas (talk) 17:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

His daughter is not notable herself (AfD). Redirecting this page to Devyani Khobragade incident, which he had little to do with would be WP:POVish, especially when he has some notability himself.Martin451 18:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Uttam Khobragade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mid-day.com/news/2004/oct/95215.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]