Talk:V. K. Duggal

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This redirect is supported by the politics and government work group.

India: Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 20:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last paragraph[edit]

The last paragraph appears to describe one side of a controversy, but I'm unfamiliar with the specifics and background, and the sourcing is insufficient to convey a controversial issue correctly. Moreover, the wording of the paragraph is unclear in some places. If someone more familiar with the controversy could consider a bit of a cleanup, and make sure that the section is or can be made NPOV, that would be great. Thanks! --joe decker ^{talk to me} 18:54, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]