Talk:V. R. Krishna Iyer

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India: Kerala Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

"India can be changed by the new generation". Rediff. August 14, 2006.

DOB/age

The Hindu has Iyer born in 1915 and dying in 2014 at the age of 100. The article is currently following this. Multiple sources agree he celebrated his 100th birthday; The Free Press Journal has him born November 15, 1914. The Hindu also has him retire "at the age of 65 on November 14, 1980." Spicemix (talk) 15:37, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had cleared the air on this confusion once earlier, when I added his bio-page on the ex-judges link on the Supreme Court site, to the article. Can't be more authentic than this official version. Also, as I once again repeat here what I had mentioned in my edit summary, when you are born, that is your first birthday. So, when you turn 99, you are celebrating your 100th birthday. - SourceOhWatch (स्रोतः उवाच) 19:06, 26 December 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SourceOhWatch (SrotahaUvacha) (talk • contribs)

Thanks for all your work on the article. Could you kindly post the Supreme Court date of birth link, and text if possible, here? Spicemix (talk) 20:51, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was surprised by the comment that when one is born, that's one's first birthday. Maybe the tradition is different in India, but in the West one's first birthday is celebrated on the first anniversary of one's birth. TimidGuy (talk) 15:17, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Views on meditation

This cannot be a section in itself. Interest in it was at best peripheral compared to the significant achievements of the protagonist, and it remained on his 'wish list' as a suggestion/proposal and did not gain traction and become a mainstream view/method. Thus undue weight cannot be given to this view of his. Moreover, along with 'Transcendental Meditation' he gives credit to other 'Yogic Kriyas' (methods of Yoga) for aiding him in his work and life. He writes, in his own words in the following lines of his autobiography:

"Mahesh Yogi, Muktananda, Aurobindo, Yogananda, Vivekananda deepened my understanding..." (p.272) "...association with the Brahmakumari Movement helped me...involve myself in yoga...for years" (p.272) "...experience came to me from Kriya Yoga...of Paramhamsa Yogananda (which) I gathered in moments of meditative silence" (p.272) "...among others... I came across Satya Sai Baba" (p. 273)

Thus, the 'Yoga method of meditation' does however deserve a mention in parallel with his other revolutionary ideas which he did manage to introduce into the Indian legal system, and so I shall move the mention of this to the section of his judgeship, citing the following lines from his autobiography again:

"if a judge practices (it) ...his mental poise will be balanced and his higher values will have a better judgement" (p. 267) "in one of my judgments I have recommended this ...for prisoners"(p.267) - SourceOhWatch (स्रोतः उवाच) (talk) 12:36, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please bear in mind that the content was not in a "section in itself" – it was there in a new section to be added to and developed. All of the spiritual interests you mention here can and should be included, because currently the article has an imbalance toward his public life at the expense of his personal life. Spicemix (talk) 12:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds quite reasonable. TimidGuy (talk) 15:15, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on V. R. Krishna Iyer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141219134514/http://www.sal.org.sg/digitallibrary/Lists/SAL%20Journal/Attachments/652/%282013%29%2025%20SAcLJ%20714-735%20%28Shubhankar%20Dam%29.pdf to http://www.sal.org.sg/digitallibrary/Lists/SAL%20Journal/Attachments/652/%282013%29%2025%20SAcLJ%20714-735%20%28Shubhankar%20Dam%29.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:52, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]