Talk:Vance Miller

Untitled

I saw the last few minutes of a programme called Britis Get Rich in China where Mr Miller and two other guys were dealing in China. Someone who saw the whole programme might want to add some info to this article. Jooler 23:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

The user 86.131.75.189 removed a block of text relating to the intention of Mr Miller to resolve any outstanding complaints his customers had, as has been confirmed by the Watchdog television program which was broadcast. I undid the edit because it's factual and presents a more neutral in the viewpoint of the article. Without it, the article reads like Mr Miller either doesn't acknowledge that he has had some customer complaints, or that he doesn't wish to deal with them. With this text in place, it shows that Mr Miller is actively working to sort out his customer problems which I think demonstrates his good faith in what is otherwise a very negatively biased article about him. Puttenhoe wiki (talk) 12:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Dishonest piece of crap. -- 184.189.217.91 (talk) 03:37, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

perhaps someone with more time could include a reference to the article http://www.nationaltradingstandards.uk/news/prison-sentences-for-unfair-trading-by-kitchen-businesses/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.109.254.24 (talk) 11:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Recent reverts

Regarding my recent reverts, I believe there to have been no valid reason for the information not to be in the article. Having spent some time researching Mr Miller, I am aware he has two children and it is also quite clear he is a serial entrepeneur - having started several companies and being an international businessman. I can think of no other suitable occupational title as not all of his business interests are kitchen related. I will also try and source a suitable image for the article and upload it when I have one which complies with the Wikipedia copyright guidelines.

Regarding the external links, one of these is to an article which helps balance out the blatant negative bias this article portrays and has given Mr Miller his "right to reply" in quite a frank matter about several points raised in this article, and the sources linked to it. Another link is to a well known UK national newspaper article which contains some information regarding some of the events going on and seems a valuable source for which there is no apparent reason for it not to be included.

One of the other links is obviously to Mr Miller's personal website which seems to be a perfectly acceptable link considering he is the subject matter, and it does not appear at all to be a blatant sales site but is clearly listing further journalistic articles and other information relating to the events surrounding Mr Miller, and giving his further right to reply on the issues surrounding him.

The other link seems to be a forum - but the source and intention are unknown. However, having looked over this it seems to be supplying original information which is (initially) verifiable. It may be related to Mr Miller but is a bit of a white elephant. I believe more research needs to be done regarding it as a relevant source of information, so I intent to register at the forum and challenge some of the claims made with a requirement of actual proof. If this is not soon forthcoming I shall remove the link again. Puttenhoe wiki (talk) 16:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

What a dishonest git. -- 184.189.217.91 (talk) 03:38, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Inclusion/exclusion of "England" in lead

I don't think that "Rochdale" or "North West England" is specific enough. The country of England should succeed each of these locations, so people not familiar with England would know. Epicgenius (talk) 18:09, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

That may well be, but that is no reason to edit war}. DES ^(talk) 18:15, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I realize that, and I acknowledge that I am wrong. Epicgenius (talk) 18:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vance Miller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928030803/http://www.oldham.gov.uk/view_press_release.htm?refno=JB%2FPR%2FES%2F43%2F07 to http://www.oldham.gov.uk/view_press_release.htm?refno=JB%2FPR%2FES%2F43%2F07

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 4 January 2018 (UTC)