Talk:Vedic square

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

hi vedic squares are great u should like totally go to tgs to go and learn about them go and try thrm any day u want on here come and have a look plz plzzzzz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.174.78 (talk) 16:47, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What should the article ultimately involve?[edit]

I mostly came across this article by accident but I think it's got some serious potential, and is just requiring the attention of someone who really knows what they are talking about. I think when this article is complete it should have a structure something like:

  • introduction+example
  • Geometric properties
    • The Vedic Square in Art
  • Algebraic properties
    • Generalisations
  • References etc

Although there may be more topics deserving of a mention than I realise. Where do you see this article going - how much do you reckon it should involve? --Paul Carpenter (talk) 12:55, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very Big Concept[edit]

This is called Group Theory & this is very easy to understand Modulle concept. I want to highlight some operations in given example it says that o but actually this is called operations which we need to perform on the figure.

A group is a set G, together with an operation '*' that combines any two elements a and b to form another element denoted a * b, then this is formed called (G,*)satisfy below requirement called Group

Operation 1--> Closure For all a, b in G, the result of the operation a * b is also in G

Operation 2--> Associativity For all a, b and c in G, the equation (a * b) * c = a * (b * c) must satisfy

Operation 3-->Identity element There exists an element E in G, such that for every element a in G, the equation E * a = a * E = a

Operation 4 -->Inverse element For each a in G, there exists an element b in G such that a * b = b * a = E, where E is the identity element


If anobody have any qestions or concern please mail me on nitu612@gmail.com

Thanks, Nitin Lawand —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.88.178.70 (talk) 11:01, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure how this is relevant to the article in question - the article actually mentions how the vedic square forms a semigroup but not a group. Paul Carpenter (talk) 16:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Change colour scheme[edit]

Digital roots with similar patterns are coded with similar hues

Does the current colour scheme for shading the digital roots have any significance? If not, may I suggest changing it to one in which the digital roots with similar patterns (simply rotated 90°) have similar colours? I've chosen

  • Red for 1 and 8: the most prominent colour for the "ellipses"
  • Blue for 2 and 7: a less prominent colour for the simplest pattern
  • Green for 3 and 6: to match yellow for some Vedic cube slices
  • Grey for 4 and 5: the least prominent colour for the "arcs"
  • Yellow for 9: it has no complement and dark yellow looks off)

as in the attached image, but am open to suggestions for change.

Cheers,
cmɢʟeeτaʟκ 16:14, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]