Talk:Velocette MAC
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | The contents of the Velocette MAC (WD) page were merged into Velocette MAC. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (2013-04-28) |
Special Category for British Motorcycles[edit]
As part of the Motorcycling WikProject I am working though all the missing articles and stubs for British Bikes. To make things easier to sort out there is a special Category:British motorcycles Please add to any British motorcycle pages you find or create. It will also help to keep things organised if you use the Template:Infobox Motorcycle or add it where it is missing. I've linked the Category to the Commons Motorcycles of Britain so you could help with matching pics to articles or adding the missing images to the Commons. The people behind the bikes also bring it all to life - I've created the Category:British motorcycle pioneers so please have a look wyham and see if you can add or expand any? Thanks Thruxton (talk) 17:35, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Articles should be categorized as per Wikipedia:Categorization. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:05, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Merge proposal: Velocette MAC (WD) into Velocette MAC[edit]
I hereby propose that Velocette MAC (WD) be merged into this article, as the former is a development the latter and the resulting merged article would cover both in the detail they are currently being covered without being unduly long. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 23:40, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- Agree. --Biker Biker (talk) 09:06, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- Don't see a problem, the bulk of the WD article can probably be dropped straight into the middle of this one. I can't recall why there was the original separation but that was long ago now. Go for it. GraemeLeggett (talk) 10:02, 21 April 2013 (UTC)