Jump to content

Talk:Verein für germanisches Heidentum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk07:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Ffranc (talk). Self-nominated at 12:46, 4 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: No - I am not sure how ALT1 is interesting.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Interesting new article. Approve ALT0 only (t · c) buidhe 11:35, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ALT0 to T:DYK/P7

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Verein für germanisches Heidentum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vaticidalprophet (talk · contribs) 10:39, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A solid article. I only have a few notes, mostly revolving around improving readability for a non-specialist audience:

  • Links to Völkisch movement mostly seem like they should be specifically piped to Völkisch movement#Modern usage in Heathenry for clarity. Similarly, a link to something like Heathenry (new religious movement)#Racial issues might be appreciated from 'universalist' in the lead, for readers who aren't necessarily familiar with the dichotomy or why VfGH rejects it.
    • Done
  • Probably worth clarifying that blót ceremonies are sacrificial. Also, is 'reinvented' the ideal word compared to more common choices like 'reconstructed'?
    • Explained blót in the lead. "Reinvention" is used in contrast to "reconstruction" in the source ("Man müsse weniger auf die vergebliche Re-Konstruktion setzen, sondern vielmehr auf die ideenreiche Re-Invention der Religion", "You have to rely less on the vain reconstruction, but rather on the conceptive reinvention of religion"). I added a few words to the article body about why they prefer this approach.
  • Consider using the {{lang}} template for German text (such as when writing the full titles of organizations). I see it's used a couple times in the article, but not consistently.
    • Added a bunch, maybe missed something.
  • "Dualist" is a little more common a phrasing than "dualistic".
    • Changed
  • The meeting was exclusively for "inclusive" Germanic neopagans, which led to discussions about what it means to be inclusive Do we have further details on such discussions?
    • Added a little. It's hard to elaborate more without WP:OR, since the source doesn't discuss the VfGH's position in particular.

I may make further comments, but these are the only clear ones at the moment. Vaticidalprophet 10:39, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]