Talk:Verpa bohemica
 | Verpa bohemica is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
 | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 9, 2013. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 3, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Verpa bohemica is a saprobic species of fungi distinguished from other species by its enormous spores? | ||||||||||||
| Current status: Featured article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Some useful discussions about edibility of Verpa bohemica may be found here: http://cascademyco.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=873 It's also eaten by many without any consequences and considered highly regardable in Ukraine and Russia. Sombra Corp. (talk) 08:19, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Edibility[edit]
The edibility section is pretty sketchy - it strongly implies that it is dangerous to eat them, but that isn't backed up by science or reliable references. In my opinion they are about as edible as morels. Most people can eat both morels and Verpas, but occasionally there are issues - usually due to undercooking. I am not aware of any studies which show the dangerous toxin gyromitrin in Verpas, I think it is more likely that they have the same toxin that makes morels toxic raw - which is currently an unknown molecule. The references all books which appear to be authors not really knowing and fear mongering about Verpas.
Alan Rockefeller (Talk - contribs) 04:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Verpa bohemica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120829162456/http://md1.csa.com/partners/viewrecord.php?requester=gs&collection=ENV&recid=4378617&q=%22Distribution+and+ecology+of+the+morels+and+false+morels+of+Iowa%22&uid=789989821&setcookie=yes to http://md1.csa.com/partners/viewrecord.php?requester=gs&collection=ENV&recid=4378617&q=%22Distribution+and+ecology+of+the+morels+and+false+morels+of+Iowa%22&uid=789989821&setcookie=yes
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:56, 7 October 2017 (UTC)