Jump to content

Talk:Verrado

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't see how this is like advertising, it states fact about the neighborhood and its development —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.225.129.59 (talkcontribs)

This entire section "Neighborhoods" reeks of marketing style wording. "The design of these neighborhoods were inspired by American neighborhoods of the early twentieth century, including those of nearby Phoenix's highly-desirable historic districts. Many homes feature garages that are accessed from a rear alley rather than from the street to provide for a more traditional and attractive streetscape." For what reason is that last sentence needed other than as a marketing tool? Pkrecker 03:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed some of the more ad-ish adjectives ("highly-desirable" and "attractive"), but it could still use some help. As for notability, we could really use some numbers (as in, number of houses that will exist at buildout) because from what I know it is planned to be a pretty sizeable community. --24.251.240.229 17:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Verrado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]