Jump to content

Talk:Versions of the Ramayana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sanskrit versions

[edit]

Versions of the Ramayana page needs a section on Sanskrit versions, which I added today. It is incomplete in a few instances, in particular the Adbhuta Ramayana and Agastya Ramayana. There are other versions to be added.Beecher70 (talk) 19:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nepalese version probably belongs with Versions Outside of India, but because of the close cultural relationship between Napal and India I left the entry in the regional section and also included it in the Versions Outside of India section.Beecher70 (talk) 19:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added a sentence on Adbhuta Ramayana on Versions page, and created separate page for Adbhuta Ramayana.Beecher70 (talk) 03:41, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Versions of Ramayana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Guys can I get some more info about Daśagrīvā Rākṣasa Charitrām Vadham except this "https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/6th-century-Ramayana-found-in-Kolkata-stuns-scholars/articleshow/50227724.cms" (Ethicalweb (talk) 16:42, 30 June 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Factual accuracy disputed

[edit]

@TrangaBellam: in this edit you added a {{disputed}} notice, but did not explain what part of this article was factually inaccurate. Since this has been up for over two years without your clarification, I've removed the notice. If you still think there are serious factual issues with this article, feel free to discuss here on the talk page. Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 16:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]