Talk:Vetulicolia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Concerning V's Deuterostome Heritage[edit]

In the following article the authors describe Skeemella clavula from the Middle Cambrian Pierson Cove Formation of the Drum Mountains of Utah. It is similar to vetulicolians but also has arthropod characteristics, which they claim casts new doubt on the deuterostome affinity of vetulicolians.

Briggs, DE, Lieberman BS, Halgedahl SL & Jarrard RD (2005), A new metazoan from the Middle Cambrian of Utah and the nature of Vetulicolia. Palaeontology 48: 681-686--Likearock 14:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not according to: Dominguez, Patricio and Jeffries, Richard. (2003). Fossil evidence on the origin of appendicularians. Paper read at International Urochordate Meeting 2003. Abstract at [2] - URL retrieved June 22, 2006. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 06:36, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of Yunnanozoa[edit]

Should we adjust the taxobox to mention the possible inclusion of the Yunnnanozoa, or no? Also, I thought they were related to hemichordates.--Mr Fink 17:37, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The hypothesis is that Yunnanozoans are related to, not part of, Vetulicolia. In any case, the classifications remain speculative and contentious. -- Donald Albury 13:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. I think this article may be best structured to first detail the 'facts' (i.e. their morphology, perhaps ecology) then the more dubious business of their taxonomy. I might get onto it it now... Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 19:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Polished up References Section[edit]

I made is consistent in format, not to mention consistently actually referenced in the Article. You're welcome. :-) Seriously, though, let's not let it get sloppy like it was again. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 06:38, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Vetulicolia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]