Talk:Video Camera Surveillance (Temporary Measures) Act 2011
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The bill is a response to the Supreme Court's ruling in Hamed & Ors v. R ?
[edit]I contest this phrase. If you look at the dates (see [1] and [2] you'll see that that it a response either to the dropping of the charges or to the un-suppression of the ruling, not the ruling itself. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- The bill's explanatory note and the SC report make it clear that it is a response to the decision itself.--IdiotSavant (talk) 12:47, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Future Development
[edit]This will eventually need an "aftermath and repeal" section detailing - any cases that are decided as a result of this law - repeal and replacement by Search and Surveillance Bill in 6 months - any political fallout --IdiotSavant (talk) 23:20, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class New Zealand articles
- Low-importance New Zealand articles
- C-Class New Zealand politics articles
- Low-importance New Zealand politics articles
- C-Class New Zealand law articles
- Low-importance New Zealand law articles
- New Zealand law articles
- WikiProject New Zealand articles
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class Human rights articles
- Low-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles