Talk:Vienna Conservatory

Which Conservatory

In pre 20th century subjects Vienna Conservatory is used to refer to University of Music and Performing Arts, Vienna. For that reason, this should be a disambiguation page, because many people read Vienna Conservatory in various articles and the term does not refer to Konservatorium Wien. --Atavi (talk)

Adding: possible names for the 1979 institution would by Vienna Konservatorium or Vienna Conservatory (1979), --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Keeping as a disambig page per above reasons, and the proposed version is the tiniest of stubs with WP:1R like problems. Weegeerunner (talk) 23:15, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Has all conversation just stopped? Weegeerunner (talk) 23:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Opo Chano:. This is not an article page, but a disambiguation page. This is not the place to build an article. I see that you are a new user. Please take a look at WP:DAB so this makes sense to you. You are being reverted because you are in essence vandalizing the page. I assume this is not what you mean to do, but is a misunderstanding about what the purpose is for this kind of page. Best wishes.(Littleolive oil (talk) 23:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC))[reply]

I don't see the point. First of all, I'm not the one who is editwarring. No matter if more or less users has the same opinion as my opponent. What is, if these several users are jumping down the bridge? Are you jumping from the bridge too or what? I'm the one who created the article so how can I be the one who is editwarring? Here (http://www.viennaconservatory.at/) is a clear proof that the Vienna Conservatory is not a disambigution page. It is a single conservatory with the name "Vienna Konservatorium", meaning Vienna Conservatory in English. So please stop, calling my constructive edits on this article "editwarring". That's nonsense. I don't care if one or more users have another opinion. I'm in the right position with my thoughts. Opo Chano (talk) 11:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've also created a new article with the name "Conservatories of Vienna". I hope that the editwarring ends here now. Opo Chano (talk) 12:22, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I try to be patient although I don't like that you accuse people while it seems to be you who doesn't understand things. Many articles mention Vienna Conservatory, meaning NOT the special one founded in 1979 which - yes - has this name (but only if you translate it). All these articles go wrong if sent to "yours". It is not helpful to pursue that path any further. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:02, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I have created an article, named "Conservatories of Vienna" and there the disambuguation is needed. I gave you a link to the Vienna Conservatory. So please don't revert anymore. I hope the problem ends here right now. Opo Chano (talk) 13:11, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Look, no article links to your newly created Conservatories, an article that nobody needs. Many articles go now to your specific one which DO NOT mean it. That is wrong. Please make it right by reverting yourself. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:16, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not going to revert anything! I tried to explain you several times that there is a link for the single conservatory, called "Vienna Conservatory" and you won't accept or understand it. It seems that I'm talking against a wall by talking to you. You are stubborn and you don't want to understand it. But I will stop discussing. As I said, if I see one more revert on my edit to this article, I will seek an admin. By the way. I read that you are from Germany and I'm from Austria and I live near Vienna. I know the Vienna Conservatory very good and as an Austrian I might have a better idea about the conservatories here in Vienna. I know it better than you and many other users on the English Wikipedia who don't know anything about conservatories and adding bullshit to this article. So, again. One more revert and an admin will be right here. Opo Chano (talk) 13:21, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I try harder. Imagine Mark Miller. That is his name, his website says so. Mark insists that Mark Miller is about him. Do you understand? Or still not?? That specific Mark Miller is not more important than the others of the name, and by overwriting the list of all, a helpful choice (called disambiguation) gets lost. Do you understand? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:28, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I understand but you won't understand me. The Vienna Konservatorium is transladed "Vienna Conservatory" in English. Other conservatories from Vienna are called Konservatorium Wien, that means Conservatory of Vienna for example. The conservatory of Vienna and other conservatories in Vienna are not the same as Vienna Conservatory. The Vienna COnservatory is the surname of Vienna Konservatorium just in English. Opo Chano (talk) 13:36, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That Mark Miller might say the same: This is my name, I need this article name. NO. There are several Mark Miller, they need something in brackets to distinguish. I suggested Vienna Conservatory (1979) above, to distinguish yours from others. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:42, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear that the new article if created should be at the German-language title of [[Vienna Konservatorium mit Öffentlichkeitsrecht]]; but its website seems to suggest that it is a business, not a public institution, and it may not meet our notability requirements. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]