Jump to content

Talk:Village East by Angelika/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 16:29, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:29, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Images are tagged appropriately; sources are reliable.

  • "The first story contains storefronts and a lobby, while the second and third stories contained offices": why "contains" for the first storey, and "contained" for the others?
    • I clarified that the offices are now apartments. Epicgenius (talk) 13:03, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can't make sense of the sequence of events in the paragraph starting "In 1942". The bank leases to Century Theatre for ten years, but only two years later apparently that's no longer the case since they lease it to Benito. Then Raynes gets it from the bank in September 44, and that fall Ben-Ami leases "the Century". What is "the Century"? We haven't said the name changed when Century leased it -- and if it did the reference to Benito leasing "the Jaffe Art Theatre" would presumably be wrong.
    • I have clarified that the name was changed to the Century Theatre. There are two things going on here: the bank owned the theater until 1944, when Raynes assumed ownership. The Century Theatre Company leased the theater for ten years but seems to have relinquished its lease after two. Benito also leased the theater, but that lease was canceled when Raynes acquired the theater.
  • "Phoenix decided to only book plays by Nobel Prize-winning writers": all but one of the list of plays that follows is not by a Nobel Prize-winning author.
    • I think the plans were changed partway through the season. However, it would be OR to say so directly. Epicgenius (talk) 13:03, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The fact that Oh! Calcutta! debuted at the theatre might be worthy of mention in the lead. Currently you don't mention any notable shows in the lead.
  • " M Square's managing director Alan J. Schuster said the company wanted "to have a legitimate theater and a film theater at the Second Avenue" without incurring the exorbitant costs of Broadway theatre contracts.[218] The movie theater would have been above the legitimate theater": "would have been"? So this never actually happened?

-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 20:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Christie: Thanks for the review. I have addressed all of these issues now. Epicgenius (talk) 13:03, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Passing. However, the reason I thought it worth mentioning Oh! Calcutta! in the lead is because it appears that this is where it was first performed; if you can't find a source for that specifically then perhaps that doesn't belong in the lead. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.