Talk:Virgin Atlantic Little Red/GA2
Appearance
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: White Arabian Filly (talk · contribs) I have 4 GAs now, so I propose to begin reviewing in order to help with the backlog. White Arabian Filly Neigh 22:34, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
GA criteria[edit]
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ![]() |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ![]() |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ![]() |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ![]() |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | ![]() |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ![]() |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ![]() |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ![]() |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ![]() |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ![]() |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ![]() |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ![]() |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. | Article meets all criteria. Congrats! |
Comments[edit]
Overall, a well-written article. I have only these concerns:
- In the table, wouldn't it be easier to use citations at the end of each line than putting them below the whole table?
- The citations support all content of the table. SSTflyer 00:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- I think the lead could use a bit more detail about the operation of the airline.
- This article is quite short (5535 characters), so I think the length of the lead section is adequate. SSTflyer 00:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
White Arabian Filly Neigh 22:55, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Ok. Thanks for being so quick to reply. White Arabian Filly Neigh 15:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)