Talk:Virtual instrument software architecture
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Dates
[edit]A date, even approximate, defining the implementation of VISA would be very helpful. When engineers consider re-employing existing equipment, a cut-off date for age would definitively eliminate specific devices as non-VISA. It's also good practice. The article has no dates.
History
[edit]Was VISA originally developed by NI? Sergivs-en (talk) 08:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Rename
[edit]Should this page not be renamed to "virtual instrument system architecture", as mentioned here? Fishezz (talk) 16:22, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Do yourself a Google search; There are other sources defining it as virtual instrument software architecture. The IVI specs, curiously, don't appear to define the acronym. ~Kvng (talk) 16:15, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Virtual instrument software architecture page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Virtual instrument software architecture" page.