Jump to content

Talk:Vitamin E/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: David notMD (talk · contribs) 21:12, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: ChopinChemist (talk · contribs) 16:54, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I'll be happy to review this article. Let me know if you're ready for feedback. Given that the article has been reviewed before, my assessment will mostly based on what caused the article to fail in the last review and see if there are any other changes necessary. I may also ask you some questions regarding the article so I have a better understanding of what you're trying to convey. Note that the GA review process box above will not start until you're ready for feedback. ChopinChemistTalk? 16:54, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Previous GA

[edit]
  • More coverage on other countries.

checkYProvided

  • 'Function' section. Rationale: Anti-oxidant is buried while specific functions are spread out

checkYProvided

Current GA

[edit]

MoS compliance

[edit]
Lead sections
[edit]
  • Vitamin E is classified as an essential nutrient for humans... The first sentence should define what Vitamin E is and following that would be the sentence that determine its significance to humans (since Vitamin E is a human nutrient is pretty common knowledge)

(ex: Vitamin E is a group of eight molecular-structure related compounds that include four tocopherols and four tocotrienols. It functions as a fat-soluble antioxidant which may help protect cell membranes from reactive oxygen species, and is classified as an essential nutrients for humans... ).

  • Declining use was theorized to be due to publications of meta-analyses that showed either no benefits or actual negative consequences from high-dose vitamin E.[8][9][10][11][12], :Try to specify which paper mentions no benefits to vitamin E and which mentions negative consequences. These two statements are pretty substantial so inline citation is a must.
Layout
[edit]
  • The sections Serum content definitions of deficiency and Vaping-associated lung injury seems out of place and should be incorporated as follows: Serum content definitions of deficiency to Deficiency and Vaping-associated lung injury to Medical applications
Words to watch
[edit]

No words of concern

List incorporation
[edit]

Appropriate use of lists

Citations

[edit]
  • [non-primary source needed] for For comparison, vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. If addressed by source [60] nearby than you may delete this.
  • Add citations for the image showing synthesis of vitamin E as there are many ways a compound can be synthesized

Individual comments

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
  • Remove: Worldwide, consumption is below recommendations according to a summary of more than one hundred studies that reported a median dietary intake of 6.2 mg per day for alpha-tocopherol.[4]. Already mentioned in "Dietary Rec." Also remove Palm oil is a source of tocotrienols.[17] as it seems out of place. Should incorporate into the table for amount of tocotrienols. Unless very few natural sources contain tocotrienols. Instead discuss if tocotrienols play a role in diet.

Medical applications

[edit]
  • Expand Age-related macular degeneration section by following other section's style of writing.

@David notMD:More feedbacks coming soon. Also ping me if this is addressed.