Talk:Vladivostok
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vladivostok article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days ![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Is Vladivostok really a "new" city?
[edit]This article treats the city as if it is new, but according to multiple sources, it is actually very old, settled by the Chinese in 600 AD. I understand from the perspective of Russian textbooks, the first settlers arrived there in the 19th century, the same place which was known as Yongmingcheng "city of eternal light" in the 1200s. If a new name city is in the same place as an old city, is it a new city? Chersonesus was established at Sevastopol prior to the arrival of Russians, so did the Russians establish Sevastopol or did the greeks? I can see that if the place was not under continual human habitation you could fairly say it was a new city, but come on. It is a harbor in china and there isn't a village still there in 1856? This strains credulity. Anyway, I have edited the second paragraph, but there is something amiss here. J JMesserly (talk) 22:13, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Which sources treat them as the same settlement? To the point that we can say that Vladivostok was founded in 600 AD. Mellk (talk) 01:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- This is a bit late, but are these sources reliable? From what I understand, Vladivostok nor much of the region were not under Chinese control during this era. In fact the first time China even reached this far was likely in the later 600s during the Tang Dynasty's Protectorate to Pacify the East, but that too likely didn't last long. Sunnyediting99 (talk) 01:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- Bumping this Sunnyediting99 (talk) 01:54, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- This is a bit late, but are these sources reliable? From what I understand, Vladivostok nor much of the region were not under Chinese control during this era. In fact the first time China even reached this far was likely in the later 600s during the Tang Dynasty's Protectorate to Pacify the East, but that too likely didn't last long. Sunnyediting99 (talk) 01:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Russia allowing China to use Vladivostok as a port for the first time
[edit]Beginning June 1 2023 China will be able to use Vladivostok as a port: https://www.stripes.com/theaters/europe/2023-05-17/russia-china-shipping-vladivostok-pacific-10143191.html#:~:text=The%20Russian%20port%20of%20Vladivostok%20opens%20to%20China,Administrations%20of%20Customs%20China%2C%20the%20nation%E2%80%99s%20customs%20ministry.
Maybe someone can add it to the Vladivostok article? Dionyseus (talk) 00:46, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Geography
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Geography
- C-Class vital articles in Geography
- C-Class WikiProject Cities articles
- All WikiProject Cities pages
- C-Class Russia articles
- Top-importance Russia articles
- Top-importance C-Class Russia articles
- C-Class Russia (human geography) articles
- Human geography of Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- C-Class Soviet Union articles
- High-importance Soviet Union articles
- WikiProject Soviet Union articles