Talk:Volleyball at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's qualification

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1st tournament's gallery disputed[edit]

1st tournament's gallery only contains Iran's matches. What is happening to Wikipedia neutral policy? Some Iranian editor makes a gallery only about Iran's matches in an article about an-eight-side-tournament and revert everybody's edit who try to make this article about the whole eight nations, NOT ONLY IRAN!!!! Moreover, nobody does nothing in this matter!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shab911 (talkcontribs) 14:38, 4 June 2016‎

AgreeNoncommittalp (talk) 14:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
:::I think there is a middle ground here. As far as I know, there is nothing in WP:EN's policy which says that we should remove perfectly good images of a sporting event just because the only images we have properly licensed show only the games in which Iran (or any other country) played. It seems backwards to penalize Iran for being the solde source of CC licensed images of this event.
With that said, I suspect that quantity of images that were removed probably broke the cited WP:EN rule prohibiting galleries that do not, as a whole, add to the understanding of the article. I've always thought that that rule was too strictly enforced, but that decision is not up to me. . . Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk to mecontribs) 17:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Don't think the matter is racism! This is a misunderstand! I move above comment here from user:Noncommittalp talk page. Mr james is an American admin but his comment is my answer. Unfortunately, Tasnim News Agency, only covers matches of Iran and we haven't photos of other matches(forexample the match between Japan and Poland) If you have free pictures of the other marches of the competition, show me; I'll upload them. Mr @Noncommittalp:, Mr @Leesw616: and Mr @Shab911:, I am waiting your answers because we should conclude the argument here.Sarbaze naja (talk) 09:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The pictures included does not fairly represent the whole tournament. There are 28 matches of which only seven were played by Iran. The appearance of the Iranian team in the gallery compared to the rest of the teams is not reasonably proportional, let alone the exemption of Venezuela. I suggest the contents of the gallery to to be re-considered. Replacement of three or more pictures from the gallery with the other 21 matches would establish equal proportion. Until then, the gallery should be held off from this article for the sake of neutrality. TjBison (talk) 21:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Did you reading above comment of your countryman?! We have no free picture of the other matches. If you have, please show us. The 7 photos, are our only property.(Ain't they enough valuable to save?)Gire 3pich2005 (talk) 21:41, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection for 2 Days[edit]

The edit warring has to stop. You need to read WP:GALLERY and be very sure that the use fits policy, then discuss it here and decide whether or not it fits into policy or not (as determined by previous global consensus) and when the protection ends, editing can resume. Dennis Brown - 01:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Result[edit]

MEX 2 TUN 3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.119.95.171 (talk) 16:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

update, please! --Daniel Dalence (talk) 00:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final discussion about pictures[edit]

Ok guys @GAV80: @94.155.238.11:. I think we should add two pictures to the article. Anyway, in no article, we haven't enough photos to cover all events. So, I recommend using 2 pictures. We can choose 2 of the 7 pictures. What is your vote? Sarbaze naja (talk) 21:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Sarbaze naja:. My opinion: 1) Iran VS France: beautiful fly; 2) Iran VS Poland: many similar fingers and one fist. GAV80 (talk) 07:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @GAV80:. No problem. I'm waiting for the third side. Should we wait ;) ?! Sarbaze naja (talk) 10:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Sarbaze naja:. Will be wait. Yet 15 hours until end of full protection. ))) GAV80 (talk) 10:18, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes. Please you update information. I just add the two photos.Sarbaze naja (talk) 10:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures are unnecessary. We don't need them. So please don't add any. Thanks! 94.155.238.11 (talk) 18:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @94.155.238.11: for your vote. But two users agreed and one disagreed. So, we add the two pictures. before adding the pictures, I call the admin to review the conclusion.Sarbaze naja (talk) 20:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You won't add the pictures, if you do, they will be removed. Thanks. 94.155.238.11 (talk) 20:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Volleyball at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's qualification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]