Talk:Voteauction
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled[edit]
If the site's copyright wasn't infringed upon, but rather whomever wrote that site also wrote this article, it's still wrong because of NPOV policies, and in general was written in a manner unfit for Wikipedia, so it should be rewritten. Sorry if I'm not following standard procedure, I'm not very familiar with the English wiki (I'm mostly on he.wiki). Volland 13:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
The article should mention that the people behind this site are at least partly members of The Yes Men and the site is obviously in close connection to the WTO action of The Yes Men earlier in 2000, where they advertised exactly such a type of website, which was fictional at that time. -- 77.23.113.166 (talk) 07:04, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Voteauction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121023231003/http://transcripts.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/08/24/internet.vote/index.html to http://transcripts.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/08/24/internet.vote/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:22, 2 July 2016 (UTC)