Jump to content

Talk:WHO-convened Global Study of Origins of SARS-CoV-2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WHO-convened study sources

[edit]

Below is a list of WP:RS that anyone may add adding to this page. LondonIP (talk) 00:15, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  1. "Australia insists WHO inquiry into Covid origin must be robust, despite China tensions", The Guardian, 28 Dec 2020
  2. "'Major stones unturned': COVID origin search must continue after WHO report, say scientists", Nature Magazine, 10 Feb 2021
  3. "Covid Origin Probe Debate Heats Up as Scientists Protest", Bloomberg News, 4 March 2021
  4. "Exclusive: WHO Investigators to Scrap Plans for Interim Report on Probe of Covid-19 Origins", The Daily Telegraph, 5 March 2021
  5. "Exclusive: Contentious Hunt for Covid's Origin Points to China Animal Trade", Bloomberg News, 20 March 2021
  6. "Exclusive: WHO Covid-19 origins report says lab leak 'extremely unlikely'", The Daily Telegraph, 29 March 2021
  7. "WHO Wuhan report leaves question of coronavirus origins unresolved", The Washington Post, 29 March 2021
  8. "UK and US criticise WHO's Covid report and accuse China of withholding data", The Guardian, 30 March 2021
  9. "'Compromise' WHO report resolves little on pandemic's origins, but details probe's next steps", Science Magazine, 30 March 2021
  10. "The WHO Report On COVID-19's Origins Shows We May Never Know Where The Coronavirus Came From", BuzzFeed News, 30 March 2021
  11. "What the WHO Investigation Reveals About the Origins of COVID-19", Foreign Affairs, 31 March 2021

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of WHO-convened Global Study of Origins of SARS-CoV-2's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "WHOconvened":

Reference named "NY Times July 2021":

Reference named "CNN July 2021":

Reference named "APNews20210211":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 08:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]