Talk:WNHT (TV)

WNHT (TV) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 20, 2021. (Reviewed version).

A fact from WNHT (TV) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 June 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Thomas Flatley compared closing WNHT television in Concord, New Hampshire, to putting down his dog?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/WNHT (TV).

Wikipedia

United States: New Hampshire Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Low-importance).

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:WNHT (TV)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basic stuff and comments[edit]

Infobox looks good.
Is there a reason the "for" template is below the lead?

Done per MOS:ORDER. Chompy Ace 22:41, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Chompy Ace and Some Dude From North Carolina: It was an attempt at me noting "this license has more related material on another page"... Didn't realize ORDER required the hatnote to go up top. By the way, thank you for doing this—you really didn't have to, Chompy Ace. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the comma after "until 1995".

Done Chompy Ace 22:41, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add a serial comma after "programs, viewers".

Done Chompy Ace 22:41, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A few sources can be archived but citing overall looks good.

Already done Chompy Ace 22:44, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, there are a few that can still be archived. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:46, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Chompy Ace 23:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guess IABot missed a few... Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Optional, but I would suggest sorting categories alphabetically.

Done Chompy Ace 22:41, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since this is a short article, that's about all I have.

Progress[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Thomas Flatley compared closing WNHT television in Concord, New Hampshire, to putting down his dog? Source: [1] "He said it was as hard for him to give the staff the bad news as it had been to put his dog to sleep."

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Iguana Girl
Comment: Together with all pending/approved/in queue nominations, represents the 50th state DYK for 2021 — three straight years!

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 03:28, 21 May 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Nominated within 7 days of passing GA. QPQ done. Article well written and properly cited. No pings on Earwigs for copyvio or close paraphrasing. Hook is cited, interesting, and short enough for DYK. Morgan695 (talk) 04:27, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

WNHT1984Logo.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

WNHT1984Logo.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]