Jump to content

Talk:WTDY-FM

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:WRDW.JPG

[edit]

Image:WRDW.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:13, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk show format

[edit]

Further reading [1].--Malerooster (talk) 23:13, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Personalities

[edit]

Are Bex and some others who have been on Chunky's show worth mentioning?

Also, maybe this section should add a note about Chunky, etc. being laid off as a result of the recent rebranding.

-KaJunl (talk) 20:35, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Constant vandalism

[edit]

It has come to my attention that someone (or some people) are constantly getting on the WTDY-FM page and adding very unnecessary information roughly every couple of hours every day, including original research and constant spelling, grammar and punctuation errors. This constant adding is making the page look sloppy and unprofessional. Is there a way that we can get the page locked to prevent further adding by spambots? Thanks.

Alex jirgens (talk) 02:12, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update on locking the page for constant vandalism

[edit]

I believe it's time to fully lock the page from IP users and new editors. If any administrators would like to discuss this, please type here.

Alex jirgens (talk) 02:12, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: requests for increases to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Semiprotection request filed. — Train2104 (t • c) 02:24, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]