Talk:Waffle slab

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 October 2018 and 14 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Moniortz. Peer reviewers: 3pedals.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article Peer Review[edit]

Hi Monica,

I've read through it a couple of times and have the following comments. I hope they’re helpful.

Best, Adrian

++++++++++++

1. (minor thing) you can use the “Format” tab to put the section headings in a larger font

2. I think you could expand on the introductory/overview paragraph to give a better sense of why someone would use a Waffle Slab (e.g. lower cost, ease of construction, added strength). That would put the rest of it into perspective. Maybe just merge the first two paragraphs together. If you know, you could give some examples of other types of flooring that could be used for the same job, but aren’t as good as it as the WS is.

3. For the Construction Process section, I think you could skip the list of forms needed if you can provide a general description of how they’re used. Something like “Waffle slabs are constructed by arranging generic forms in the desired shape and then filling them with concrete.” Or, maybe provide some sort of description of what the forms are and do? It just seems like a list with no description doesn’t provide much help to the uninformed reader (i.e. me).

4. Why are there three ways the slabs are manufactured? Does one some have benefit over the others?

5. In Rules of Thumb, what does “Slab/24” mean? 1 inch thick for every 24 inches wide?

6. I’d rewrite the second bullet as: “Ribs are typically 5 inches to 6 inches wide and have steel rod reinforcements.”

7. Advantages/Disadvantages: I think these sections would be clearer if you set them up with a general intro sentence (“Waffle slab construction has several advantages:” and then follow it with bullet points.

8. Grammar: there are a lot of minor grammatical errors, e.g. A Waffle Slab or Two way joist slab is a reinforced concrete…; The Waffle Slab is flat and thin on top while joists create a grid-like surface…; The system is composed by of intricate forms… Give it a good review to be sure you catch them all.

9. “Other Considerations”--I think you want this to be “Sources”, instead.

3pedals (talk) 20:41, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adrian, Thank you for all the pointers, for sure will use them! Monica! Moniortz (talk) 21:03, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Instructor comments[edit]

This is a good start that covers the basics of waffle slabs, but as your peer reviewer noted, it could use a good copy edit.

Your plan for the article included finding examples of structures with waffle slabs (e.g., the Washington Metro shown in the Constructor reference), which would help tie this article into the rest of Wikipedia.

Finally, it would be useful to compare waffle slabs to other structural systems such as ordinary concrete slabs, voided biaxial slabs, etc.Elizabeth Linden Rahway (talk) 12:28, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated?[edit]

The article states "Waffle slabs are preferred for spans greater than 40 feet (12 m), as they are much stronger than...". However my observation is that all new buildings are using post-tensioned slabs, which are much thinner yet strong. I'm not an expert on the subject and haven't found a source listing the prevalence of each type. -SCEhard T 19:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]